We need to be
quite a bit more vigilant as to who gets elected to office. The most
current example, but unfortunately not the only example, is the Indiana
Senate race between Mourdock and Connelly. Let me quote an article by
Ann Friedman:
Mourdock’s opponent, Democrat Joe Donnelly, also believes “life begins at conception” and opposes abortion except for cases of rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. Last year, he co-sponsored HR 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, that would have banned abortion coverage in state health-insurance exchanges. Maybe he didn’t make a stupid comment about divinely inspired pregnancies as a result of rape, but he does cite his faith as a reason he opposes women’s right to choose. NARAL gives him a score of only 20 percent. He voted twice to block Planned Parenthood from receiving any federal funding. (http://nymag.com/thecut/2012/10/mourdocks-opponent-just-the-lesser-of-two-evils.html).
Call
them Conservadems, call them Blue Dogs, it all reads the same: These
democrats are socially conservative, and just like their Republican
counterparts, are putting PRIVATE morality above PUBLIC morality.
Women, and likewise men, do not need government to tell them what they
can and cannot do with their bodies--regardless of whether we are
talking about abortion or birth control. But ladies WE ARE AT FAULT FOR
BEING LOW INFORMATION VOTERS if we allow someone like Connelly to win
(which is the case in Indianna, unfortunately). I can understand voting
for the "lesser of two evils," but consider this--when he writes,
sponsors, and votes for legislation that restricts our right to legal
medical care, how can we be shocked if we allowed this person to be
elected to office?
My plea
is simply this: We allowed our vigilance to fail, hence why we are
fighting this fight again after 40+ years. We did not find a candidate
to run against him in the Democratic Primary to defeat him. We will
also pay the price for this lack of vigilance for the next 6 years,
because he will not soften his position. He will not compromise. We
have for far too long.
No comments:
Post a Comment